<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version='2.0' xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Fishki.net - Tag «beauty standard»</title>
<link>https://en.fishki.net/tag/beauty-standard/hot/</link>

<description>Fishki.net - Сайт хорошего настроения</description>
<language>ru-ru</language>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 07:55:20 +0300</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 07:55:20 +0300</pubDate>
<atom:link href="https://en.fishki.net/tag/beauty-standard/hot/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<item>
	<title>10 Hot Celebs Who Wouldn’t Be Considered Attractive 25 Years Ago</title>
	<description>
		25 years ago, the 90’s were upon us: Gameboys, Seinfeld, Nirvana and a beauty ideal that is very different from the curvaceous, big booty babes of today. Take a look at Scarlett Johansson, for example, and compare her with the women who embodied beauty in the 90s, like supermodel Kate Moss. The beauty standard in the 90s was a thinness that was borderline skeletal, but bodies of the today celebs wouldn’t have been as trendy, attractive as they are now.		&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://tn.fishki.net/26/preview/1960787.jpg&quot;/&gt;	</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 14:51:30 +0300</pubDate>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://en.fishki.net/post/1960787/</guid>
	<link>https://en.fishki.net/1960787-10-hot-celebs-who-wouldnt-be-considered-attractive-25-years-ago.html</link>
	<enclosure url="https://tn.fishki.net/26/preview/1960787.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="1024"/>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>